লেকার্স মালিকানা উত্তরাধিকারসূত্রে যায় না

by:MidnightXG•1 মাস আগে

830

লেকার্স মালিকানা উত্তরাধিকারসূত্রে যায় না

##অটুট বিশ্বস্ততা শমস্‌-এর $100B-এর मूल्याङ्कन के खबर पড़াमাত्रे मনे ‘ওয়াও!’-ই नहीं, ‘কীভাবে?’ -এই सवाल आলগা हुआ।

আসলটি ₹হয়নি,পদক্‌ষ्‌টগत ‍‍গঠনই।জেরি বাস্‌-এর children-দেर अभिभावकत्व केंद्रिक दस्ताबेज/উত्तराधिकार केन’t।

মালিকদলটি now unique trust fund-এ संगठित,ছয়জন child-দेर मध्य में समान भाग।

किन्तु,इसका महत्त्वपूर्ण पहलु—कोনও one share inheritable होयना।

##উত্তरপণি,শুধুমাত্‌ر ভোট আমি crystal clear: This family business is not typical.

যদি one of the six pass away? Their share doesn’t go to their kids. It gets redistributed among the living siblings.

So if Dan Woike is right and it’s structured as a “survivor-only” trust—then each death reduces ownership stakes by one piece of pie.

It’s like an NBA roster with no bench players—if you’re out, you’re out, and someone else steps up. Brutal? Yes. Effective? Absolutely.

This wasn’t emotional legacy planning—it was cold, calculated succession engineering.

##Why This Matters More Than You Think You’d think this was just for show—a last wish from a billionaire owner who loved control. But no. This design ensures that selling the team requires unanimous consent from all six siblings. That means even one dissenting voice can block any sale—even at $100B+. In sports finance terms? That’s like having a 95% xG advantage but still losing because your star striker refuses to take the final shot. Think about it: What if one kid hates new owners? Or fears cultural change? They hold all power—not through votes, but through silence. The media calls this ‘family drama.’ I call it organizational integrity under pressure. In my work modeling football clubs using Tableau and Python—where player transfers are forecasted via xA chains—I see parallels:

A team needs stability when assets grow exponentially;
Leadership must resist emotional bias;
Governance rules must survive generational shifts without collapse; The Lakers aren’t just worth $100B—they’re protected by math before emotion ever enters the room.

954

1.63K

MidnightXG

লাইক：38.67K অনুসারক：3.37K

Football data scientist from London | Creating actionable insights with advanced metrics | Premier League specialist | Believer in xG philosophy | Let's redefine how we understand the beautiful game. #AnalyticsFC

No Inheritance? More Like No Exit

So the Lakers are worth $100B? Cool. But here’s the twist: you can’t pass your shares to your kids. If one of Jerry Buss’s six kids kicks it? Their stake doesn’t go to their heirs—it gets redistributed like free pizza at halftime.

Survivor-Only Trust = Brutal Math

It’s not family drama—it’s mathematical warfare. One dissenter can block any sale. Even at $100B+. It’s like having the best xG in soccer but losing because your star striker refuses to take the final shot.

Legacy Over Bloodlines

Jerry didn’t care about heirlooms—he cared about legacy integrity. The trust isn’t about love. It’s about survival at scale. No single point of failure. No emotional inheritance. Just cold, calculated control.

You think this is drama? Nah—this is governance on steroids. Who’s next: LeBron as trustee? Comment below—what would you do if you were born into this dynasty? Let’s settle this in the comments!

759

CarioFutebol

1 মাস আগে

Herança proibida no Lakers

Parece que o legado do Jerry Buss não é para quem vive mais… é para quem sobrevive! 🤯

Se um dos filhos morrer? Sua parte vira pizza pra irmãos vivos — nenhuma herança pra netos. É tipo um reality show de futebol com eliminação direta: se você cai fora, sai da equipe e do patrimônio.

E tem mais: vender o time? Só com todos os seis concordando. Um “não” basta pra bloquear uma venda de 100 bilhões!

Isso não é família… é governança com veto absoluto! 💥

Você quer herdar o Lakers? Primeiro precisa nascer dentro do trust… e ser vivo!

Quem aqui quer ser o próximo jogador da rotação? Comentem lá! 👇

371

КіберТренер

1 মাস আগে

Лакіс — не дід, а тайна

Хто живе довше — той і володіє? Ні! У Лакіс це не «заслуга за довге життя», а «вбивство спадкоємця».

Смерть = зменшення долі

Якщо один із шести братів помере — його частку розподіляють між живими. Такий варіант: навіть якщо ти улюбленець батька, то помер — і все: твоя доля зникла як кепка після тренерської розмови.

Краще ніж у Польщі

Це не симфонія родинних почуттєв. Це математика! Якщо хочеш продати Лакіс за $100 млрд — треба всіх шестеро сказати «так». Або один каже «ні» — і гра закрита.

Навіть якщо один брат ненавидить нових власників… Ну що ж, цей «нi» стояти так само довго, як мотузка на крилатах у Дончанки.

Ваш коментар? Коли бажаєте вилетити з франшизи? 🏀🔥

370

ShadowPlay_87

1 মাস আগে

Why Lakers Can’t Be Inherited

Let me break it down: Jerry Buss didn’t leave behind wills—he left behind rules. No heirs. No dynasty. Just six kids who can’t pass on shares.

If one dies? Their slice of the pie gets redistributed like leftover pizza at a family BBQ. No trust fund for the grandkids—unless they were born into the club (and let’s be real: that’s rarer than a triple-double in overtime).

It’s not emotional legacy—it’s veto-based governance. One ‘no’ from any sibling can kill a $100B sale. Like having the best xG in the league but your star player refuses to shoot.

So yes—this isn’t family drama. It’s organizational resilience… with more drama than an NBA Finals Game 7.

You think this is about money? Nah. It’s about math protecting the brand.

Who’s next? Comment below—should we add ‘survivor-only’ rules to reality TV too?

968

ব্রাজিলীয় ফুটবল